Muse Ember 1.0 vs Qwen 3.8 Max 0902

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Try Muse Ember 1.0 in Chat

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Muse Ember 1.0 for

The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0005)
The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
The only one that takes audio

Choose Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 for

The most routes on Phaseo: 3

Overview

Lab

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Priced onMeta · StandardGMICloud · Standard

Input

from $0.10/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.10Input > 200K$0.30

$1.65/ 1M tokens

Output

from $0.50/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.50Input > 200K$1.50

$4.951/ 1M tokens

Cache read

from $0.004/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.004Input > 200K$0.012

$0.206/ 1M tokens

Cache write

No write fee listed

$2.063/ 1M tokens

Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out

$0.0005

$0.0058

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

Input tokens per request

Output tokens per request

Cached share of input (%)

Requests per day

ModelMonthly costPer requestPer month

Muse Ember 1.0Meta · Standard$0.0005$13.50

Qwen 3.8 Max 0902GMICloud · Standard$0.0058$173.265

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50last 24 hours

1.64 s

No traffic in the last 5 days

Throughput p50last 24 hours

111 tps

No traffic in the last 5 days

Requests, last 24 hours

None in the last 24 hours

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

Tokens, last 30 days

841

No traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days

Per day

841

12 Oct10 Nov

Input

646

–

Output

–

Reasoning

177

–

Requests

–

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling

Yes

Structured outputs

Yes

Reasoning effort

Yes

Web search

Yes

Prompt cachingon the chosen route

Yes

Quantisationon the chosen route

Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Max effort · 1 of 2 models tested

Muse Ember 1.036

Qwen 3.8 Max 0902090233.7

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index58 models ranked

Artificial Analysis Coding Index171 models ranked

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index112 models ranked

Epoch Capabilities Index166 models ranked

Cost

Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better

$117.12

$6,3540902

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

GMICloud

—

$1.65 in · $4.951 out1M context

Details

Knowledge cutoff

Not published

Status

Available

Licence

Proprietary

Subscription plans

None mapped

API docs

Not published

Open docs

Muse Ember 1.0 vs Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: side-by-side summary

Muse Ember 1.0 and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Muse Ember 1.0 is from Meta. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens.

Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 is from Qwen. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $1.65 per 1M input tokens and $4.951 per 1M output tokens.

Muse Ember 1.0 model details, providers and pricing Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 model details, providers and pricing

Muse Ember 1.0 vs Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 at a glance

Muse Ember 1.0 and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 compared on price, context window and benchmark score
Attribute	Muse Ember 1.0	Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Lab	Meta	Qwen
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.10	$1.65
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.50	$4.951
Context window	1,048,576 tokens	1,000,000 tokens
Max output	524,288 tokens	131,072 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index	36.0 (#16)	33.7 (#18)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Muse Ember 1.0 or Qwen 3.8 Max 0902?

Muse Ember 1.0 is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Muse Ember 1.0 costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens; Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 costs $1.65 and $4.951, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Muse Ember 1.0 or Qwen 3.8 Max 0902?

Muse Ember 1.0 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen 3.8 Max 0902.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Muse Ember 1.0 or Qwen 3.8 Max 0902?

Muse Ember 1.0 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Muse Ember 1.0 scores 36.0, ranked #16 of 58. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 scores 33.7, ranked #18 of 58.

Can I use Muse Ember 1.0 and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.