Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Ember 1.0
Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.
At a glance
Generated from the rows below
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
No clear lead on the rows below.
Choose Muse Ember 1.0 for
- The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
- The only one that takes video, audio
- The longest output: 524,288 tokens
Overview
Pricing
Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model
What will it cost?
Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model
Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.
Performance
Live gateway traffic
Activity
Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days
Features
Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support
Benchmarks
Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent
Higher is better · at Max effort · 2 of 2 models tested
Where they rank
The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index58 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.264.6
- #2Claude Opus 5.559.1
- #3GPT-6 Astra56.9
- #4GPT-6.1 Sol54.6
- #5Claude Sonnet 5.554.5
- #15Claude Haiku 5.536.5
- #16Muse Ember 1.036.0
Epoch Capabilities Index166 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.2174.2
- #2GPT-6 Astra169.2
- #3GPT-6.1 Sol168.9
- #4Claude Opus 5.5168.7
- #5GPT-6.1 Terra168.1
- #16Claude Haiku 5.5160.3
Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.
Providers
Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.
To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.
Details
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Ember 1.0: side-by-side summary
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Ember 1.0 are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is from Anthropic. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens.
Muse Ember 1.0 is from Meta. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens.
Claude Haiku 5.5 model details, providers and pricingMuse Ember 1.0 model details, providers and pricing
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Ember 1.0 at a glance
| Attribute | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Muse Ember 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | Anthropic | Meta |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 524,288 tokens |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 36.5 (#15) | 36.0 (#16) |
Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Muse Ember 1.0?
They cost the same. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens; Muse Ember 1.0 costs $0.10 and $0.50, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.
Which has the longer context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Muse Ember 1.0?
Muse Ember 1.0 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Haiku 5.5.
Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Muse Ember 1.0?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 36.5, ranked #15 of 58. Muse Ember 1.0 scores 36.0, ranked #16 of 58.
Can I use Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Ember 1.0 through one API?
Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.