Muse Ember 1.0 vs Muse Wonder 1.0

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Muse Ember 1.0
Muse Wonder 1.0

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Muse Ember 1.0 for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0005)

Choose Muse Wonder 1.0 for

No clear lead on the rows below.

Overview

Context window
1.05Mtokensfrom provider listings
Not published
Max output
524Ktokensfrom provider listings
Not published
Takes
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
1 provider
1 provider
Released
9 Nov 2026
12 Oct 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Meta · StandardMeta · Standard
Input
from $0.10/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.10Input > 200K$0.30
$4.00/ 1M tokens
Output
from $0.50/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.50Input > 200K$1.50
$20.00/ 1M tokens
Cache read
from $0.004/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.004Input > 200K$0.012
$0.20/ 1M tokens
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.0005 (best)
$0.018

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Muse Ember 1.0Meta · Standard$0.0005$13.50
Muse Wonder 1.0Meta · Standard$0.018$540.00

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50last 24 hours
1.64 s
No traffic in the last 5 days
Throughput p50last 24 hours
111 tps
No traffic in the last 5 days
Requests, last 24 hours
1
None in the last 24 hours

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

Tokens, last 30 days
841
93.5K
Per day
841
12 Oct10 Nov
92.6K
12 Oct10 Nov
Input
646
78.7K
Output
18
8.08K
Reasoning
177
6.8K
Requests
1
11

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Not listed
Structured outputs
Yes
Not listed
Reasoning effort
Yes
Not listed
Web search
Yes
Yes
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Max effort · 2 of 2 models tested

Muse Ember 1.036
Muse Wonder 1.043.6

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index58 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.264.6
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.1
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra56.9
  4. #4GPT-6.1 Sol54.6
  5. #5Claude Sonnet 5.554.5
  6. #13Muse Wonder 1.043.6
  7. #16Muse Ember 1.036.0
Cost
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
$117.12 (best)
$5,414

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

$0.10 in · $0.50 out (best)from $2.50 per 1K requests Native web search requests1.05M context
$4.00 in · $20.00 out$2.50 per 1K requests Native web search requests

To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Not published
Status
Available
Available
Licence
Proprietary
Proprietary
Subscription plans
None mapped
4 plansMuse Code Everyday Usage, Muse Code High Usage, Muse Code Maximum Usage…
API docs
Not published
Not published

Muse Ember 1.0 vs Muse Wonder 1.0: side-by-side summary

Muse Ember 1.0 and Muse Wonder 1.0 are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Muse Ember 1.0 is from Meta. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens.

Muse Wonder 1.0 is from Meta. On its cheapest route it costs $4.00 per 1M input tokens and $20.00 per 1M output tokens.

Muse Ember 1.0 model details, providers and pricingMuse Wonder 1.0 model details, providers and pricing

Muse Ember 1.0 vs Muse Wonder 1.0 at a glance

Muse Ember 1.0 and Muse Wonder 1.0 compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeMuse Ember 1.0Muse Wonder 1.0
LabMetaMeta
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$20.00
Context window1,048,576 tokensNot listed
Max output524,288 tokensNot listed
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index36.0 (#16)43.6 (#13)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Muse Ember 1.0 or Muse Wonder 1.0?

Muse Ember 1.0 is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Muse Ember 1.0 costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens; Muse Wonder 1.0 costs $4.00 and $20.00, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Muse Ember 1.0 or Muse Wonder 1.0?

Muse Wonder 1.0 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Muse Wonder 1.0 scores 43.6, ranked #13 of 58. Muse Ember 1.0 scores 36.0, ranked #16 of 58.

Can I use Muse Ember 1.0 and Muse Wonder 1.0 through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.