DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Ember 1.0

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 in Chat

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for

The most routes on Phaseo: 18

Choose Muse Ember 1.0 for

The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0005)
The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
The only one that takes video, audio

Overview

Lab

DeepSeek

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Priced onDeepInfra · StandardMeta · Standard

Input

$0.20/ 1M tokens

from $0.10/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.10Input > 200K$0.30

Output

$0.60/ 1M tokens

from $0.50/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.50Input > 200K$1.50

Cache read

$0.006/ 1M tokens

from $0.004/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 200K$0.004Input > 200K$0.012

Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out

$0.0007

$0.0005

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

Input tokens per request

Output tokens per request

Cached share of input (%)

Requests per day

ModelMonthly costPer requestPer month

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepInfra · Standard$0.0007$21.00

Muse Ember 1.0Meta · Standard$0.0005$13.50

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50last 24 hours

No traffic in the last 5 days

1.64 s

Throughput p50last 24 hours

No traffic in the last 5 days

111 tps

Requests, last 24 hours

None in the last 24 hours

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

Tokens, last 30 days

32.2K

841

Per day

16.3K

12 Oct10 Nov

841

12 Oct10 Nov

Input

28.7K

646

Output

1.28K

Reasoning

2.25K

177

Requests

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling

Yes

Structured outputs

Yes

Reasoning effort

Yes

Web search

Yes

Prompt cachingon the chosen route

Yes

Quantisationon the chosen route

Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Max effort · 2 of 2 models tested

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101732.6

Muse Ember 1.036

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index58 models ranked

Epoch Capabilities Index166 models ranked

Cost

Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better

$520.63

$117.12

Agents

Agents' Last Examreported by the lab

35.4%

61.6%Agents' Last Exam, Linux subset

Code

Terminal Bench 4.0reported by the lab

42.3%Terminal-Bench 4.0

40.9%Terminal Bench 4.0

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

DeepInfra

$0.098 in · $0.294 out1.05M context · Standard, Flex, Priority

—

Details

Knowledge cutoff

Not published

Status

Available

Licence

MIT

Proprietary

Subscription plans

None mapped

API docs

Not published

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Ember 1.0: side-by-side summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Ember 1.0 are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is from DeepSeek. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens.

Muse Ember 1.0 is from Meta. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 model details, providers and pricing Muse Ember 1.0 model details, providers and pricing

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Ember 1.0 at a glance

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Ember 1.0 compared on price, context window and benchmark score
Attribute	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Muse Ember 1.0
Lab	DeepSeek	Meta
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.20	$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.60	$0.50
Context window	1,000,000 tokens	1,048,576 tokens
Max output	384,000 tokens	524,288 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index	32.6 (#19)	36.0 (#16)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Ember 1.0?

Muse Ember 1.0 is cheaper for both input and output tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens; Muse Ember 1.0 costs $0.10 and $0.50, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Ember 1.0?

Muse Ember 1.0 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Ember 1.0?

Muse Ember 1.0 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Muse Ember 1.0 scores 36.0, ranked #16 of 58. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores 32.6, ranked #19 of 58.

Can I use DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Ember 1.0 through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.