Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Claude Fable 5.2
Gemini 4 Carbon

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Claude Fable 5.2 for

  • The lowest latency on Phaseo: 3.01 s
  • The longest output: 128,000 tokens
  • Included in 27 subscription plans

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.009)
  • The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • The fastest output on Phaseo: 15.3 tps

The models are statistically tied on the Epoch Capabilities Index: their 95% confidence intervals overlap.

Overview

Context window
1Mtokens
1.05Mtokens (best)from provider listings
Max output
128Ktokens (best)
65.5Ktokensfrom provider listings
Takes
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
2 providers
2 providers
Released
9 Nov 2026
10 Nov 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Anthropic · StandardGoogle AI Studio · Standard
Input
$8.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$8.80
$2.00/ 1M tokens (best)
Output
$40.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$44.00
$10.00/ 1M tokens (best)
Cache read
$0.20/ 1M tokensRegion: US$0.22
$0.10/ 1M tokens (best)
Cache write, 5 minutes
$10.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$11.00
No write fee listed
Cache write, 1 hour
$16.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$17.60
No write fee listed
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.036
$0.009 (best)

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic · Standard$0.036$1,080
Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle AI Studio · Standard$0.009$270.00

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50last 5 days
3.01 s (best)
17.5 s
Throughput p50last 5 days
1.3 tps
15.3 tps (best)
Requests, last 24 hours
None in the last 24 hours
None in the last 24 hours

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

Tokens, last 30 days
22
24.7K
Per day
22
16 Oct14 Nov
24.7K
16 Oct14 Nov
Input
18
21.8K
Output
4
1.66K
Reasoning
0
1.2K
Requests
1
15

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured outputs
Yes
Yes
Reasoning effort
Yes
Yes
Web search
Yes
Not listed
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Epoch Capabilities Index Independent

Higher is better · dot is the estimate, band is the 95% confidence interval · Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0

Claude Fable 5.2173.4 95% CI 169.9–177.5
Gemini 4 Carbon169.8 95% CI 166.5–173.5

Every interval overlaps, so these models are statistically tied on this index.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at High effort · 2 of 2 models tested

Claude Fable 5.261.8
Gemini 4 Carbon60

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index62 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.264.6
  2. #2Gemini 4 Carbon60.0
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.559.1
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra56.9
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Sol54.6

Epoch Capabilities Index165 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.2173.4
  2. #2Gemini 4 Carbon169.8
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra169.0
  4. #4Claude Opus 5.5168.5
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Sol168.5
Cost
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
$7,106
$5,333 (best)
General
Not tested at this effort
350.8

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

$8.00 in · $40.00 out$10.00 per 1K requests Native web search requests1M context · Standard, Batch, Priority
—
—
$2.00 in · $10.00 out1.05M context · Standard, Batch, Flex, Priority
—
$2.00 in · $10.00 out1.05M context · Standard, Batch, Flex, Priority
$8.00 in · $40.00 out$10.00 per 1K requests Web search1M context
—
Also listed, not routed
6 providers
—

To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Not published
Status
Available
Available
Licence
Proprietary
Proprietary
Subscription plans
27 plansClaude Enterprise, Claude Max, Claude Pro…
25 plansCursor Enterprise, Cursor Pro, Cursor Pro+…
API docs
Not published
Not published

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon: side-by-side summary

Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 4 Carbon are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.2 is from Anthropic. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $8.00 per 1M input tokens and $40.00 per 1M output tokens.

Gemini 4 Carbon is from Google. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.

Claude Fable 5.2 model details, providers and pricingGemini 4 Carbon model details, providers and pricing

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon at a glance

Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 4 Carbon compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeClaude Fable 5.2Gemini 4 Carbon
LabAnthropicGoogle
Input price per 1M tokens$8.00$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$40.00$10.00
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index64.6 (#1)60.0 (#2)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per 1M input tokens and $40.00 per 1M output tokens; Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 and $10.00, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.2.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Claude Fable 5.2 scores 64.6, ranked #1 of 62. Gemini 4 Carbon scores 60.0, ranked #2 of 62.

Which is faster on Phaseo, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon generates a median 15 tokens per second through Phaseo, compared with 1 for Claude Fable 5.2.

Can I use Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 4 Carbon through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.