Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Astra

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Gemini 4 Carbon
GPT-6 Astra

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.009)
  • The only one that takes audio, video
  • Included in 25 subscription plans

Choose GPT-6 Astra for

  • The largest context window: 1,050,000 tokens
  • The longest output: 128,000 tokens

The models are statistically tied on the Epoch Capabilities Index: their 95% confidence intervals overlap.

Overview

Context window
1.049Mtokensfrom provider listings
1.05Mtokens (best)
Max output
65.5Ktokensfrom provider listings
128Ktokens (best)
Takes
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Text, Image
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
2 providers
2 providers
Released
10 Nov 2026
3 Sept 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Google AI Studio · StandardOpenAI · Standard
Input
$2.00/ 1M tokens
from $10.00/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 272K$10.00Input > 272K$20.00
Output
$10.00/ 1M tokens
from $50.00/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 272K$50.00Input > 272K$75.00
Cache read
$0.10/ 1M tokens
from $1.00/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 272K$1.00Input > 272K$2.00
Cache write
No write fee listed
from $12.50/ 1M tokensInput ≤ 272K$12.50Input > 272K$25.00
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.009 (best)
$0.045

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle AI Studio · Standard$0.009$270.00
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Standard$0.045$1,350

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50last 5 days
17.5 s
No traffic in the last 5 days
Throughput p50last 5 days
15.3 tps
No traffic in the last 5 days
Requests, last 24 hours
None in the last 24 hours
None in the last 24 hours

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

Tokens, last 30 days
24.7K
406
Per day
24.7K
16 Oct14 Nov
406
16 Oct14 Nov
Input
21.8K
216
Output
1.66K
190
Reasoning
1.2K
0
Requests
15
20

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured outputs
Yes
Yes
Reasoning effort
Yes
Yes
Web search
Not listed
Yes
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Epoch Capabilities Index Independent

Higher is better · dot is the estimate, band is the 95% confidence interval · Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0

Gemini 4 Carbon169.8 95% CI 166.5–173.5
GPT-6 Astra169.0 95% CI 166.1–172.3

Every interval overlaps, so these models are statistically tied on this index.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at High effort · 2 of 2 models tested

Gemini 4 Carbon60
GPT-6 Astra54.8

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index62 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.264.6
  2. #2Gemini 4 Carbon60.0
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.559.1
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra56.9
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Sol54.6

Artificial Analysis Coding Index168 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.181.6
  2. #2GPT 5.6 Sol78.3
  3. #3Claude Opus 578.0
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra77.1
  5. #5Grok 4.676.8

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index110 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.157.9
  2. #2Claude Opus 556.5
  3. #3Qwen 3.8 Max 090256.0
  4. #4Muse Spark 1.355.5
  5. #5Qwen 3.8 Flash Next53.6
  6. #8GPT-6 Astra51.0

Epoch Capabilities Index165 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.2173.4
  2. #2Gemini 4 Carbon169.8
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra169.0
  4. #4Claude Opus 5.5168.5
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Sol168.5
Cost
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
$5,333
$3,204 (best)
General
350.8 (best)
347.4
Agents
Agents' Last Examreported by the lab
77.4%
59.3%
OSWorld 2.1reported by the lab
81.5%
80.9%OSWorld 2.1, offline set
Code
Terminal Bench 4.0reported by the lab
65.2%
58.2%Terminal-Bench 4.0
Science
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1reported by the lab
64.8%
68.1%Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

$2.00 in · $10.00 out1.05M context · Standard, Batch, Flex, Priority
—
—
$10.00 in · $50.00 out$10.00 per 1K requests Native web search requests1.05M context · Standard, Batch, Flex, Priority, Ultrafast
$2.00 in · $10.00 out1.05M context · Standard, Batch, Flex, Priority
—
—
$10.00 in · $50.00 out922K context
Also listed, not routed
—
4 providers

To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Apr 2026
Status
Available
Available
Licence
Proprietary
Proprietary
Subscription plans
25 plansCursor Enterprise, Cursor Pro, Cursor Pro+…
23 plansChatGPT Business, ChatGPT Business Codex, ChatGPT Business Premium…
API docs
Not published

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Astra: side-by-side summary

Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6 Astra are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Gemini 4 Carbon is from Google. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.

GPT-6 Astra is from OpenAI. It has a 1,050,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens.

Gemini 4 Carbon model details, providers and pricingGPT-6 Astra model details, providers and pricing

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Astra at a glance

Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6 Astra compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeGemini 4 CarbonGPT-6 Astra
LabGoogleOpenAI
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$10.00
Output price per 1M tokens$10.00$50.00
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens128,000 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index60.0 (#2)56.9 (#4)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-6 Astra?

Gemini 4 Carbon is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens; GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 and $50.00, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-6 Astra?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Gemini 4 Carbon scores 60.0, ranked #2 of 62. GPT-6 Astra scores 56.9, ranked #4 of 62.

Can I use Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6 Astra through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.