GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.
At a glance
Generated from the rows below
Choose GPT-6 Luna for
- The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0002)
- The largest context window: 1,050,000 tokens
Choose Qwen 3.8 Flash Next for
No clear lead on the rows below.
Overview
Pricing
Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model
What will it cost?
Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model
Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.
Performance
Live gateway traffic
Activity
Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days
Features
Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support
Benchmarks
Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent
Higher is better · at Max effort · 1 of 2 models tested
Where they rank
The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index60 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.264.6
- #2Claude Opus 5.559.1
- #3GPT-6 Astra56.9
- #4GPT-6.1 Sol54.6
- #5Claude Sonnet 5.554.5
- #28Qwen 3.8 Flash Next28.6
- #30GPT-6 Luna27.9
Artificial Analysis Coding Index171 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.181.6
- #2GPT 5.6 Sol78.3
- #3Claude Opus 578.0
- #4GPT-6 Astra77.1
- #5Grok 4.676.8
- #17Qwen 3.8 Flash Next73.1
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index112 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.157.9
- #2Claude Opus 556.5
- #3Qwen 3.8 Max 090256.0
- #4Muse Spark 1.355.5
- #5Qwen 3.8 Flash Next53.6
Epoch Capabilities Index167 models ranked
- #1Claude Fable 5.2173.4
- #2Gemini 4 Carbon169.8
- #3GPT-6 Astra169.0
- #4Claude Opus 5.5168.5
- #5GPT-6.1 Sol168.5
- #35GPT-6 Luna156.4
Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.
Providers
Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.
To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.
Details
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: side-by-side summary
GPT-6 Luna is from OpenAI. It has a 1,050,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens.
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is from Qwen. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.12 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.
GPT-6 Luna model details, providers and pricingQwen 3.8 Flash Next model details, providers and pricing
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next at a glance
| Attribute | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen 3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $0.00 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | Not listed |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 27.9 (#30) | 28.6 (#28) |
Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper for both input and output tokens. GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens; Qwen 3.8 Flash Next costs $0.12 and $0.40, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.
Which has the longer context window, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next?
GPT-6 Luna has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,048,576 tokens for Qwen 3.8 Flash Next.
Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next scores 28.6, ranked #28 of 60. GPT-6 Luna scores 27.9, ranked #30 of 60.