Phaseo

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Grok 4.6

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Try Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 in Chat
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Grok 4.6

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0011)
  • The largest context window: 1,000,000 tokens

Choose Grok 4.6 for

  • The only one that takes images
  • The longest output: 500,000 tokens
  • The most routes on Phaseo: 4

Overview

Lab
Inclusion AI
SpaceXAI
Context window
1Mtokens (best)
500Ktokens
Max output
262Ktokens
500Ktokens (best)from provider listings
Takes
Text
Text, Image
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
1 provider
4 providers
 (best)
Released
29 Oct 2026
12 Aug 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

NovitaAI · StandardSpaceXAI · Standard
Input
$0.30/ 1M tokens
from $2.00/ 1M tokensInput < 200K$2.00Input ≥ 200K$4.00
Output
$0.90/ 1M tokens
from $6.00/ 1M tokensInput < 200K$6.00Input ≥ 200K$12.00
Cache read
$0.06/ 1M tokens
from $0.50/ 1M tokensInput < 200K$0.50Input ≥ 200K$1.00
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.0011 (best)
$0.007

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019NovitaAI · Standard$0.0011$31.50
Grok 4.6SpaceXAI · Standard$0.007$210.00

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50
No traffic in the last 5 days
No traffic in the last 5 days
Throughput p50
No traffic in the last 5 days
No traffic in the last 5 days
Requests, last 24 hours
None in the last 24 hours
None in the last 24 hours

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

None of these models has had traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days.

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured outputs
Not listed
Yes
Reasoning effort
Yes
Yes
Web search
Not listed
Yes
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Extra high effort · 1 of 2 models tested

Ling 3.1 Flash 101929.6
Grok 4.631

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index50 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Opus 5.559.1
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra56.9
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol54.6
  4. #4Claude Sonnet 5.554.5
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Terra51.3
  6. #19Grok 4.631.0
  7. #22Ling 3.1 Flash 101929.6

Artificial Analysis Coding Index171 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.181.6
  2. #2GPT 5.6 Sol78.3
  3. #3Claude Opus 578.0
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra77.1
  5. #5Grok 4.676.8

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index112 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.157.9
  2. #2Claude Opus 556.5
  3. #3Qwen 3.8 Max 090256.0
  4. #4Muse Spark 1.355.5
  5. #5Qwen 3.8 Flash Next53.6
  6. #7Grok 4.653.0

Epoch Capabilities Index164 models ranked

  1. #1GPT-6 Astra169.1
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.5168.4
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Terra168.1
  4. #4GPT-6.1 Sol167.8
  5. #5Claude Sonnet 5.5166.7
  6. #26Grok 4.6156.9
Cost
Artificial Analysis Evaluation Cost (USD)matched by effort level · lower is better
$2,009 (best)
$3,391
General
Artificial Analysis Progress Index v1matched by effort level
321.6 (best)
320.8

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

NovitaAI
$0.30 in · $0.90 out1M context
—
SpaceXAI
—
$2.00 in · $6.00 out$5.00 per 1K requests Native web search requests500K context · Standard, Priority
GMICloud
—
$2.00 in · $6.00 out500K context
Inference.net
—
$2.00 in · $6.00 out500K context
Venice
—
$2.27 in · $6.80 outfrom $10.00 per 1K requests Web search500K context
Also listed, not routed
—
8 providers

To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Not published
Status
Available
Available
Licence
MIT
Proprietary
Subscription plans
None mapped
15 plansCursor Enterprise, Cursor Pro, Cursor Pro+…
API docs
Not published
Open docs

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Grok 4.6: side-by-side summary

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and Grok 4.6 are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is from Inclusion AI. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens.

Grok 4.6 is from SpaceXAI. It has a 500,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens.

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 model details, providers and pricingGrok 4.6 model details, providers and pricing

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Grok 4.6 at a glance

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and Grok 4.6 compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeLing 3.1 Flash 1019Grok 4.6
LabInclusion AISpaceXAI
Input price per 1M tokens$0.30$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.90$6.00
Context window1,000,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens500,000 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index29.6 (#22)31.0 (#19)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or Grok 4.6?

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens; Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 and $6.00, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or Grok 4.6?

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 has the longer context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 500,000 tokens for Grok 4.6.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Grok 4.6 scores 31.0, ranked #19 of 50. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 29.6, ranked #22 of 50.

Can I use Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and Grok 4.6 through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.