Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Inkling 2 Small
Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.
At a glance
Generated from the rows below
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 for
- The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0011)
Choose Inkling 2 Small for
- The only one that takes images
Overview
Pricing
Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model
What will it cost?
Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model
Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.
Performance
Live gateway traffic
Activity
Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days
None of these models has had traffic through Phaseo in the last 30 days.
Features
Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support
Benchmarks
Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent
Higher is better · each model’s best reported variant
Where they rank
The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index54 models ranked
- #1Claude Opus 5.559.1
- #2GPT-6 Astra56.9
- #3GPT-6.1 Sol54.6
- #4Claude Sonnet 5.554.5
- #5GPT-6.1 Terra51.3
- #22Inkling 2 Small30.6
- #24Ling 3.1 Flash 101929.6
Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.
Providers
Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.
To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.
Details
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Inkling 2 Small: side-by-side summary
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and Inkling 2 Small are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is from Inclusion AI. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens.
Inkling 2 Small is from Thinking Machines Lab. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.00 per 1M output tokens.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 model details, providers and pricingInkling 2 Small model details, providers and pricing
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Inkling 2 Small at a glance
| Attribute | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Inkling 2 Small |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | Inclusion AI | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $0.90 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens | Not listed |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 29.6 (#24) | 30.6 (#22) |
Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or Inkling 2 Small?
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is cheaper for output tokens; input tokens cost the same. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.
Which has the longer context window, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or Inkling 2 Small?
Both have a 1,000,000-token context window.
Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 or Inkling 2 Small?
Inkling 2 Small scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Inkling 2 Small scores 30.6, ranked #22 of 54. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 29.6, ranked #24 of 54.
Can I use Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and Inkling 2 Small through one API?
Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.