Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen

Pick a route and service tier under each model. Prices, the calculator and the verdicts follow your choice.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Gemini 4 Hydrogen

At a glance

Generated from the rows below

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

  • The fastest output on Phaseo: 130 tps
  • The longest output: 128,000 tokens
  • The most routes on Phaseo: 7

Choose Gemini 4 Hydrogen for

  • The lowest cost per typical request ($0.0068)
  • The largest context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • The lowest latency on Phaseo: 0.99 s

Overview

Context window
1Mtokens
1.05Mtokens (best)
Max output
128Ktokens (best)
65.5Ktokens
Takes
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Returns
Text
Text
Routes on Phaseo
7 providers
(best)
2 providers
Released
28 Sept 2026
12 Nov 2026

Pricing

Prices on the route and tier chosen under each model

Anthropic · StandardGoogle AI Studio · Standard
Input
$2.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$2.20
$1.50/ 1M tokens (best)
Output
$10.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$11.00
$7.50/ 1M tokens (best)
Cache read
$0.10/ 1M tokensRegion: US$0.11
$0.075/ 1M tokens (best)
Cache write, 5 minutes
$2.50/ 1M tokensRegion: US$2.75
No write fee listed
Cache write, 1 hour
$4.00/ 1M tokensRegion: US$4.40
No write fee listed
Typical request2K tokens in, 500 out
$0.009
$0.0068 (best)

What will it cost?

Estimate a month of requests on the route and tier chosen for each model

ModelPer requestPer month
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · Standard$0.009$270.00
Gemini 4 HydrogenGoogle AI Studio · Standard$0.0068$202.50

Uses the route and tier chosen under each model, over 30 days. Cached input is billed at the cache-read rate.

Performance

Live gateway traffic

Latency p50last 24 hours
3.31 s
0.99 s (best)
Throughput p50last 24 hours
130 tps (best)
40.0 tps
Requests, last 24 hours
15
22

Activity

Tokens sent through Phaseo each day over the last 30 days

Tokens, last 30 days
338K
1.63K
Per day
174K
15 Oct13 Nov
1.63K
15 Oct13 Nov
Input
278K
718
Output
60.3K
104
Reasoning
0
806
Requests
35
22

Features

Features from the parameters Phaseo routes support

Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured outputs
Yes
Yes
Reasoning effort
Yes
Yes
Web search
Yes
Not listed
Prompt cachingon the chosen route
Yes
Yes
Quantisationon the chosen route
Not stated
Not stated

Benchmarks

Only results that two or more of the selected models report get a row

Compare at effort

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Independent

Higher is better · at Extra high effort · 2 of 2 models tested

Claude Sonnet 5.549.9
Gemini 4 Hydrogen54

Where they rank

The five leaders on each capability index, then the compared models. Each model at its best-scoring setting.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index61 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.264.6
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.1
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra56.9
  4. #4GPT-6.1 Sol54.6
  5. #5Claude Sonnet 5.554.5
  6. #6Gemini 4 Hydrogen54.0

Epoch Capabilities Index165 models ranked

  1. #1Claude Fable 5.2173.4
  2. #2Gemini 4 Carbon169.8
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra169.0
  4. #4Claude Opus 5.5168.5
  5. #5GPT-6.1 Sol168.5
  6. #8Claude Sonnet 5.5166.6
Agents
OSWorld 2.1reported by the lab
83.9%OSWorld 2.1, offline set
77.6%
Code
Terminal Bench 4.0reported by the lab
70.6%Terminal-Bench 4.0
57%

Lab-reported results come from each lab’s own launch materials and may use different settings, so none is marked best. Independent results come from third-party evaluators.

Providers

Where each model runs on Phaseo, with standard-tier prices per 1M tokens. Providers that serve more of these models come first.

$2.00 in · $10.00 out1M context · Standard, Batch
$1.50 in · $7.50 out (best)1.05M context · Standard, Batch
$2.00 in · $10.00 out$10.00 per 1K requests Native web search requests1M context · Standard, Batch
—
—
$1.50 in · $7.50 out1.05M context · Standard, Batch, Priority
$2.00 in · $10.00 out1M context · Standard, Batch
—
$2.00 in · $10.00 out1M context
—
$2.20 in · $11.00 out1M context · Standard, Batch
—
$2.20 in · $11.00 out1M context · Standard, Batch
—
$2.20 in · $11.00 out1M context · Standard, Batch
—
Also listed, not routed
2 providers
—

To price the whole page on one of these providers, pick it under the model’s name at the top.

Details

Knowledge cutoff
Not published
Not published
Status
Available
Available
Licence
Proprietary
Proprietary
Subscription plans
None mapped
None mapped
API docs
Not published

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen: side-by-side summary

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen are both available through the Phaseo API, so switching between them is a change of model id rather than a new integration.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is from Anthropic. It has a 1,000,000-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen is from Google. It has a 1,048,576-token context window. On its cheapest route it costs $1.50 per 1M input tokens and $7.50 per 1M output tokens.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 model details, providers and pricingGemini 4 Hydrogen model details, providers and pricing

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen at a glance

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen compared on price, context window and benchmark score
AttributeClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LabAnthropicGoogle
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$1.50
Output price per 1M tokens$10.00$7.50
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index54.5 (#5)54.0 (#6)

Prices are each model's cheapest standard route on Phaseo. Benchmark ranks use each model's best-scoring evaluated setting.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen is cheaper for both input and output tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens; Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs $1.50 and $7.50, each on its cheapest standard route on Phaseo.

Which has the longer context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Which scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 54.5, ranked #5 of 61. Gemini 4 Hydrogen scores 54.0, ranked #6 of 61.

Which is faster on Phaseo, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 generates a median 130 tokens per second through Phaseo, compared with 40 for Gemini 4 Hydrogen.

Can I use Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen through one API?

Yes. Both are served through the Phaseo API, so you can switch between them by changing the model id.

Help keep public data accurate

See something missing, incorrect, or out of date? Tell us about this page.